first, there is no evidence what so ever, and second, I refuse to give my
callsign to people who continuously bully and victimise for it. I would also
remind you, that I am under no legal obligation to give it to anyone when
not on air.
Simon
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 2:19 AM
Subject: Re: looking for a 934 aerial please.
> what's your call sign? there is good evidence that suggests you don't have
> one.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 8:34 PM
> Subject: Re: looking for a 934 aerial please.
>
>
> > and why should I not buy ham radio transmitters, when I have a licence
> > already?
> > also, why should I take the test twice just to please you?
> >
> > Simon
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----=20
> > From: "Georgina Joyce" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 3:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: looking for a 934 aerial please.
> >
> >
> >> Hi Simon
> >>
> >> I'm sorry, but you keep asking difficult questions of the radio
communi=
> > ty.
> > Many of us will NOT assist you in breaking the law. You keep buying
amat=
> > eur
> > transmitters and now your asking for a CB antenna, which I understand to
=
> > be
> > an ilegal CB UK band. Or is this yiki wrong?
> >>
> >>
> >> Many CB users who witnessed the noisy and unruly conditions on 27
MH=
> > z
> > wanted to get away from all that and use
> >> the superior 934 MHz UHF CB allocation. In fact, the cost of cutting
> > edge (at the time) UHF radio equipment
> >> meant that only the more serious CB operator would use the band, a
n=
> > ice
> > though expensive haven for mature CB
> >> operators, and radio hams who didn't like the 'red tape' of amateur
> > radio. At first the range was limited, but
> >> as antenna restrictions were lifted and better equipment started to
> > appear, the number of UHF CB operators
> >> grew. The 934 MHz band was eventually discontinued by the
government=
> > on
> > [23]31 December [24]1998 due to low
> >> user numbers. The main reason for the public refusing to accept the
=
> > 934
> > MHz band was its cost (up to =A3500 for
> >> a radio), coupled with the fact that by the time reliable Japanese
> > equipment became available in the
> >> mid-1980s, most people had opted for the noisy and cheap 27 MHz, or
> > gone on to take the Radio Amateur Exam.
> >>
> >> I suggest that you undertake the amateur exams and you'll develope the
> > skills to build your own antennas legal or ilegal but don't ask us to do
=
> > it
> > for you.
> >>
> >> Gena
> >> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 08:20:10AM +0100, goshawk wrote:
> >> > hello list,=3D20
> >> > I am looking for a good 934MHZ aerial, for both transmit and receive
=
> > =3D
> >> > please. I would prefer a vertical rather than a beam.=3D20
> >> > if anyone has one to clear out, or knows where there are any going,
=3D
> >> > please email off list to,=3D20
> >> > [log in to unmask]
> >> >
> >> > Simon=3D20
> >> >
> >> ---end quoted text---
> >>
> >> --=20
> >> 2E0AXU
> >>
> >> Freedom & Power provided by debian GNU Linux
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
|
