BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: good radio
From:
Tom Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:42:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (79 lines) 
    Don:

I think it's about the best you can do these days for $39.95, and it is a
fairly good radio, although I don't think quite as good as the Super II.

Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Bishop" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: good radio


> Tom,
>
> Thanks.  A phone jack will be a real help, and it does sound like a pretty
good radio from all I've heard.
>
> Don  On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:08:32 -0400, Tom Behler wrote:
>
>     Don:
>
> Maybe someone on the list can correct me if I'm wrong, but the Super III.
> has two headphone jacks:  one mini, and the other a standard quarter-inch
> phono jack.  And, I think they might be stereo for reasons I don't
> understand.
>
> Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Bishop" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 8:11 PM
> Subject: Re: good radio
>
>
> > Tom,
>
> > Does the super 3 have any output jacks?  Such as for headphones or maybe
> but probably not a line output?
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Don  W6SMB
>
> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 20:09:18 -0400, Tom Behler wrote:
>
> >     Howard:
>
> > I think I paid $39.95 for my GE Super III. radio about a year and a half
> > ago.
>
> > I will say, though, that I think the older Super II. was better in terms
> of
> > both AM and FM selectivity and sensitivity.  The Super II. also sounded
> > better to me.  The Super III. seems to have a smaller speaker, or at
least
>
> > speaker that gives you less of an audio range.
>
> > Still, though, for $39.95, it's not a bad radio.  I just wish they would
> > have kept the original design for the older Super II. model.
>
> > Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 10:21 AM
> > Subject: good radio
>
>
> > > I don't know what they are charging for the super radio III but it is
> the
> > > best AM radio I have found.
> > > I have three of them.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2