BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Humbert <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:35:09 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
Mine is good but I don't like the hum that I hear with it 6 inches away from
my head on my head board.  Is that a flaw or are thay all that way?  I often
run it on batteries just to avoid that.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: good radio


>    Howard:
>
> I think I paid $39.95 for my GE Super III. radio about a year and a half
> ago.
>
> I will say, though, that I think the older Super II. was better in terms
> of
> both AM and FM selectivity and sensitivity.  The Super II. also sounded
> better to me.  The Super III. seems to have a smaller speaker, or at least
> a
> speaker that gives you less of an audio range.
>
> Still, though, for $39.95, it's not a bad radio.  I just wish they would
> have kept the original design for the older Super II. model.
>
> Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 10:21 AM
> Subject: good radio
>
>
>> I don't know what they are charging for the super radio III but it is the
>> best AM radio I have found.
>> I have three of them.
>>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2