Very good points, Anthony, and those I totally agree with.  I think we need
to step back and let the UN handle this, not us.

Kat

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Arnold" <[log in to unmask]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.c-palsy
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: Iraq


> Speaking of the first Golf War in '91, I was in 7th grade at that time
> so I don't remember much other than a friend's brother got shot and he
> had to learn how to walk again.  Other than that, I don't know what
> progress was made or what was undone.  But however Iraq and Saddan
> haven't done anything against us like Bin Laden has and will continue
> way after he even dies, I think based on talking to people.  We have one
> problem, why do we want to make another, another and a whole scale of
> problems and problems regenerating themselves.  I'm getting ready for
> another 9/11 just because of Bush liking to play war, and this time they
> will probably take out the whole Washington DC, New York or maybe even
> both.  This war could be like a wedding invitation with no time, no date
> printed and saying "please RSVP but we know you will just come any time
> you want".  Let's talk about paper to print the invitations on and what
> to wear.  Remember we don't know what day it's going to happen, so we
> will need at least 3 of the same outfits :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Anthony
>
> Visit me at http://www.anthonyarnold.net/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of K. Salkin
> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 4:58 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Iraq
>
> Mag, what hard evidence do you have  that this is all to do with oil?
> I'm a
> bit sceptical about that.
>
> Oil may be an issue, but I think it's a minor one.  It's primarily to do
> with Bin Laden and to go after Saddam and finish the job his father
> started.
> Saddam tried to invade Kuwait, probably for the oil for himself,  not
> the US
> invading for oil.  We have got better things to do than to invade
> countries
> for their oil.
>
> Where are you reading that invading Iraq is due to US business
> interests?
>
> Kat
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Magenta Raine" <[log in to unmask]>
> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.c-palsy
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 6:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Iraq
>
>
> > In a message dated 3/7/03 9:22:11 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> > [log in to unmask] writes:
> >
> > > This was last night, in the East Room of the White House.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
> > > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Magenta Raine
> > > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 1:40 AM
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: Iraq
> > >
> > > Perhaps I saw another press conference. (it was the one with the
> blue
> > > background and yellow circles of some kind).
> > >
> >
> > Yep, it was a different press conference. A senator from South
> Carolina
> gave
> > a speech  on this war and pointed out that Israel who is right next
> door
> to
> > Iraq doesn't seem bothered by Saddam at all. When they were, they took
> care
> > of it by bombing a nuke plant in Iraq. So, I really doubt we are
> worried
> > about Saddam's weapons, or liberating Iraq from Saddam, It's about
> oil, I
> > think, and controlling US business interests there. I think we need to
> > understand there is a lot going on behind the facade of the Bush
> > administration.
> >
> > Mag, getting off her soap box!
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > I am available to do writing, editing, reporting, designing jobs,
> including
> > business cards, etc. I am also a disability rights activist.
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~