Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:50:01 -0800 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
--
>jean-claude:
>> Yes everything can be use by egos to separate ,especially sarcasm!
>
>Maybe 'separate' is just as valid as 'connected'. ;)
to want to be validated in separating seems to me , an inconscious desire
to connect.
>
>> "spiritual help " (and not "spirituality ") was just a word to attempt
to
>> express a feeling of connectiveness to the whole.
>
>If you felt this connectedness, I doubt that you would be seeking it all
the
>time, or expecting that others perseverate on it as much as you do.
you are free from any of my expectations . I was not even talking to you in
the first place .
>
>> something it seems , you will rather choose to kill in the nest than
>> opening up to.
>
>What is the proper response to a line like that???
>
>How about: you win. You're connected and I'm separate and you are good and
I
>am evil and any questioning of your premises proves exactly that.
>
Proper, win, good , evil?? seems hard to appreciate life when seen as a
contest .and one proper answer.
you lose more than you think !
jean-claude
|
|
|