DDeBar wrote:
>Who, exactly, is "the enemy" here? The USSR? Why, exactly? 

They tried to associate themselves with socialism.

If socialism was in the USSR, then it was in its most authoritarian state.

Undesirable, I think.

>Was it over the social ownership of property? Or the insuffiency of the
forms thereof?

Its hierarchic structures was one of its most annoying characteristic.

>And, if this is the case, what forms do you juxtapose as better historical
models?

Any model which doesn't share the same authoritarian traits.  Specific
historical models? I’m no historian, so even if I point you to you one
example, I couldn’t argue it at length.

Milutin

--
What we don't know keeps tha contracts alive and movin'
They don't gotta burn tha books, they just remove 'em