The article posted is interesting. Much of what is said is correct,
but the article errs badly in blaming all bad research on Fisher's
procedures. The claim that the possibility of false results may be higher
than expected, usually refers to multiple tests, a point that the
posted article does not make clear. Also, the techniques of Bayes are
controversial precisely because of their subjectivity.

I will comment on the article, in more depth, later this week.

Tom Billings