RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Rex Harrill <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Dec 1998 13:49:44 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Nieft / Secola wrote:

>
> So I assume that high brix correlates with pH 6.4 and falls off at either
> end, no?

Exactly the hypothesis that I want to prove by a lengthy compilation of pH/Brix
field tests.  You're getting it, Kirt, you're getting it.

The first thing I'd like to establish is whether the leaf pH can be at an "OK"
6.4 (i.e., a well-balanced soil), but the Brix might be stuck in a low range
because the total available nutrition is too low.  This would surely help
explain those rare low-Brix crops that are *not* gobbled up.

Thanks,
Rex Harrill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2