PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Shkabara <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:12:40 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
I have used both. From a performance standpoint, the SCSI drives are
probably better, but in practice, you will probably not notice a difference.
However, on most systems, it is easier to boot from an IDE drive than SCSI.
The choice is yours, but I would probably boot from SCSI just because it
SHOULD be the better performer :) .

Peter
-----------------------------------------------
The NoSpin Group
[log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
I have 2 choices of drive, they are both 7200RPM, both Seagate but that's
where the similarities stop. I use an Adaptec Ultra2 SCSI controller (4+
years old at this stage) and 36GB Ultra2 SCSI drive, and in the past this
combination has worked well but not necessarily mind-blowing in terms of
performance.

Jerry O'Connell.

                  Visit our website regularly for FAQs,
               articles, how-to's, tech tips and much more
                          http://freepctech.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2