INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Edo Neilson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 May 2000 07:53:45 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Chris:

> .. Solo un puncto io vole accentuar un poco
> plus fortemente: Il vale que on non pote proponer nove vocabulos pro le
> lexico de interlingua sin recercar le linguas fonte, ma on pote sin dubita
> crear e usar nove formationes libere, conforme al regulas date in le IG, con
> certe additiones generalmente acceptate - e non oblidante le principio
> fundamental: le analogia. Naturalmente, un uso toto irrestricte de
> neologismos semblarea aliquanto bizarre e nocerea probabilemente le
> comprension del lector. ...

Io es de accordo. 

Io pensava a 'nove radices' sed scribeva de 'nove parolas'. Io deberea haber scribite que si on prefere usar solo le duo (o tres) obras de referentia, on non pote esser propositor de nove radices o de nove significationes de radices existente.

cordialmente
Edo

ATOM RSS1 RSS2