It might be purchased under certain circumstances.  I have purchased a
talking money reader and find it quite helpful.

As for the camera, I see this as one of the initial steps along the path
to full pedestrian independence which you may have but many do not.  I
will be happy considering my travel needs to acquire any aid which will
lessen the barriers I face.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Eadie" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: Assistive Technology Should Empower, Not "Help," Disabled
People


Tom wrote:

Given a qualified team and a decent amount of money, the glove could be
made
practical using more or less existing COTS technology.

I am still not for throwing out the whole glove concept, but the
practical
part is related to the person who would use the glove.  I still insist,
like the talking money reader, the consumer would not buy it when a pen
and
paper is still cheaper and easy to carry around.  This example continues
to
demonstrate the need to consult with people with disabilities first.
Just
because we can do it, does not mean we should do it.  Another example,
would be the camera technology for use by people who are blind.  This
camera project has been around for years and significant improvements
have
been made.  But, I still would not go and get one for myself because the
minimal gain is not worth the effort.  If the best one can do is walk
around easier with the camera, the sight provided is not enough because
I
get around just fine with my cane.
Ross Eadie
Voice:  (204) 339-5287