It might be purchased under certain circumstances. I have purchased a talking money reader and find it quite helpful. As for the camera, I see this as one of the initial steps along the path to full pedestrian independence which you may have but many do not. I will be happy considering my travel needs to acquire any aid which will lessen the barriers I face. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ross Eadie" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:29 PM Subject: Re: Assistive Technology Should Empower, Not "Help," Disabled People Tom wrote: Given a qualified team and a decent amount of money, the glove could be made practical using more or less existing COTS technology. I am still not for throwing out the whole glove concept, but the practical part is related to the person who would use the glove. I still insist, like the talking money reader, the consumer would not buy it when a pen and paper is still cheaper and easy to carry around. This example continues to demonstrate the need to consult with people with disabilities first. Just because we can do it, does not mean we should do it. Another example, would be the camera technology for use by people who are blind. This camera project has been around for years and significant improvements have been made. But, I still would not go and get one for myself because the minimal gain is not worth the effort. If the best one can do is walk around easier with the camera, the sight provided is not enough because I get around just fine with my cane. Ross Eadie Voice: (204) 339-5287