Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Date: |
Tue, 27 May 1997 10:58:56 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The enormous imporvement in late capitalism as a result of 60-70's activism is apparent everywhere around us
wcm
>
> R. Hormell adds some flavor to the discussion of my disagreements w/ Chomsky's
> interview in Z, but I think he falls into a romantic trap when he suggests that
> most revolutionaries of the 60s were killed, jailed or ODed. I can go along w/
> marginalized.
>
> During that decade, I remember having similar discussions all the time
> especially by 69 when it was clear that revolution was no longer imminent. The
> important thing is to serve as an image for those who will come along to fuel
> the next revolutionary upsurge. In this sense, there was a degree of success
> although at great personal cost for some.
>
> Andy Chertow
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
|
|
|