I believe Mr. Issodhos could clarify many things if he were to let us all know if
he believes there is, or should be, any relationship between fairness and law.  I
know I'm dying to know.
Larry the Lurker

"Issodhos @aol.com" wrote:

> In a message dated 12/18/00 6:15:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, [log in to unmask]
> writes:
>
> > You appear to relish the opportunity to call people names. You stated that
> >  Democrats were stealing and that the Florida Supreme Court was usurping.
> >  Supposing that you are merely embellishing on the situation, when you say
> >  that
> >  all of the votes were counted, except the absentee ballots, then you have
> >  contradicted yourself.
>
>     Sigh.  I was, of course, referring to the original count.  Obviously the
> absentee ballots would not have been counted until after the deadline for
> receiving them.
>
> >  Furthermore, the law is expected to withstand our rational criticism,
> >  particularly in the name of fairness.  Therefore, when the law is not fair
> > it
> >  has not been ratinalized and is in need of clarification.
>
>     No, your statement is in need of clarification.  I invite you to support
> your claim that the law is about "fairness."
>
> >  If you are
> >  attempting to defend an hiatus between the law and fairness, then I suggest
> >  you make a stronger claim about the validity of law in our society because
> >  after this absurdity, the potential for chaos and resistance
> >  has been sharpened!
>
>     Do you even know what it is you are trying to say here?
> Yours,
> Issodhos