--- Elizabeth Thiers <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Actually, Pres. Bush the 1st's reaction to Andrew
> sucked and it was deemed
> to little too slow.  Some feel it was one of the
> many reasons he lost to
> Clinton.  Gov. Bush wasn't around yet.

was either governor bush around then? yes, bush 1
reacted too slow. not fast



>
> Beth T. the OT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Kathy
> Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 7:39 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Here's an article on the preparedness
> of FEMA.
>
> Pres. Bush responded much more quickly when
> Hurricane Andrew hit in 1992 -
> he was there within hours.  Of course that was
> probably because his brother
> was the governor and he was the governor of Texas
> then.  But still...!
>
> The people of Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama
> aren't going to forget
> this, I'm sure.
>
> Kat
>
>
> On Saturday 03 September 2005 4:03 pm, Magenta Raine
> wrote:
> > the whole thing incenses me too, Kathy.
> especially when I heard fema
> > was NOT allowing swiftboats to make rescues
> because they needed more
> security.
> > I was thinking, excuse me, did i hear that right?
> these are trained ng
> > troops that have fought in wars, and you're
> worried about their
> > security???? and bush is obscene when  he
> continued to ride his bike
> > in idaho after the hurricane, it makes me so sick.
> I'm with you,
> > kathy, this is the usa damit, why can't we rescue
> our own?  and if he
> > is not impeached, I am seriously thinking about
> moving or at least will
> wish i could!
>





______________________________________________________
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/