--- Elizabeth Thiers <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Actually, Pres. Bush the 1st's reaction to Andrew > sucked and it was deemed > to little too slow. Some feel it was one of the > many reasons he lost to > Clinton. Gov. Bush wasn't around yet. was either governor bush around then? yes, bush 1 reacted too slow. not fast > > Beth T. the OT > -----Original Message----- > From: St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Kathy > Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 7:39 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Here's an article on the preparedness > of FEMA. > > Pres. Bush responded much more quickly when > Hurricane Andrew hit in 1992 - > he was there within hours. Of course that was > probably because his brother > was the governor and he was the governor of Texas > then. But still...! > > The people of Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama > aren't going to forget > this, I'm sure. > > Kat > > > On Saturday 03 September 2005 4:03 pm, Magenta Raine > wrote: > > the whole thing incenses me too, Kathy. > especially when I heard fema > > was NOT allowing swiftboats to make rescues > because they needed more > security. > > I was thinking, excuse me, did i hear that right? > these are trained ng > > troops that have fought in wars, and you're > worried about their > > security???? and bush is obscene when he > continued to ride his bike > > in idaho after the hurricane, it makes me so sick. > I'm with you, > > kathy, this is the usa damit, why can't we rescue > our own? and if he > > is not impeached, I am seriously thinking about > moving or at least will > wish i could! > ______________________________________________________ Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/