BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Leeke <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - "Infarct a Laptop Daily"
Date:
Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:36:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Christopher:
<<
<<  The paint industry knows that we will not spend much more than $25./gal
for
paint and so they give is paint products with short-term performance because
a better ones would cost more. This paint marketing fact is well known
within the paint industry >>

John, what "should" a gallon of paint cost?  What's the top conceivable end?
And what, in the real world, is closest to it?
>>

My source says $50.-100. is the ball park. This applies to oil-base as well
as waterborne acrylic. According to my source a big part of the issue of
cost/quality/performance in service is the quality of binder resin. Real
world products? I'm not a painter and thus not into the market regularly
enough to know. I have been testing and working with acrylic paints made for
the artist/fine arts market which seem to have this higher level of binder
quality. The Golden folks happily provide as much technical support as I
want, but this is not a recomendation for their products.

John Leeke, Preservation Consultant

publisher:               Practical Restoration Reports
contributing editor: Old-House Journal
postal:                    26 Higgins St., Portland, Maine  04103, USA
phone & fax:           01 207 773-2306
email:                      [log in to unmask]
website:                  www.HistoricHomeWorks.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2