BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Met History <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - "Infarct a Laptop Daily"
Date:
Tue, 14 Mar 2000 16:17:29 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
In a message dated 03/14/2000 11:42:10 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<<  The paint industry knows that we will not spend much more than $25./gal
for
 paint and so they give is paint products with short-term performance because
a better ones would cost more. This paint marketing fact is well known
within the paint industry >>

John, what "should" a gallon of paint cost?  What's the top conceivable end?
And what, in the real world, is closest to it?

Christopher "JimHickspleasehurryupwithmywindows" Gray

ATOM RSS1 RSS2