BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Progress of the Ladies
From:
John Callan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
"Let us not speak foul in folly!" - ]<en Phollit
Date:
Wed, 29 Jan 2003 22:21:33 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (675 bytes) , text/enriched (702 bytes) , John Callan, AIA.vcf (588 bytes) , John Callan, AIA.vcf (588 bytes) , text/plain (-1 MB) , text/enriched (-1 MB) , text/plain (-1 MB) 
Them be the first group of Preservation Babes of which I was thinkin' 
alright!

-jc

On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 09:41  PM, Candice Brashears wrote:

> In a message dated 1/29/03 10:01:58 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
>
> What a thought for the morning?!  To slam together visions of the DAR
> and the current Ladies of the NPS!
>
>
>
> Yikes. the "Ladies" of fame of which you speak are likely the Mount 
> Vernon Ladies Association and Pamela Cunningham c.1850s;  Without whom 
> the "Laddies" might not have discovered a lucrative niche in the 
> "history trade" - taken over the field - and relegated those "Ladies" 
> to the docent chair.
>
> Signed,
> Not D.A.R.
>









--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2