In a message dated 10/2/98 4:28:14 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:

> why we need a less
>  freewheeling alternative to B-P, which is the more freewheeling alternative
>  to P-L?

I am NOT making another listserv in order to accomodate the 23rd degree of
preservationist's deviance. This is NOT the HP reformation. This is not a
movement toward secular nihilism. Oh, cripes, I'm tired of negatives. Go read
the preamble and be happy. In the pursuit of happiness the flagpole up the
flag was a refeshing break. No, my problem was that I could not remember what
"tertiary" meant, though I'm happy to see that it connects to geodesics.

][<en