BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Brownstone vs. .... permastone
From:
"Mark W. James" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Darling, all I want is that you should be a pinhead -- Arlene Croce" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 Aug 2002 01:29:14 EDT
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (324 bytes) , text/html (951 bytes) 
In a message dated 8/8/2002 8:16:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> Which is preferable?  To keep a solid, intact facade of "real" permastone?
> Or to replace it with tinted stucco - fake brownstone.

You know, that name "Permastone," sounds like an embalming fluid or slang for
viagra.  What in the heck is Permastone?
MJ

ATOM RSS1 RSS2