Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:38:35 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Sorry, gonna have to inject my two cents worth here! If "someone" wants
new, go build it in suburbia (or as in-fill at worst)! If it's historic and
not endangered, better to leave it the F___ alone than to try to make it
"clean" and totally obliterate the signs of how it got from its origin to
the present. I personally don't care if its an "A", a "C", or a "P"; the
damage and loss are all the same. That said, I'm not against maintenance
and care, I'm just against trying to make something with a history to share
look too sanitary. Buildings develop patina just like furniture, and that
needs to be maintained without destroying it.
Tom Gray
|
|
|