Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
adaptive re-use is from the department of repetitive redundancy
division < [log in to unmask]> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 7 Dec 2007 20:06:18 -0800 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=response |
Reply-To: |
adaptive re-use is from the department of repetitive redundancy
division < [log in to unmask]> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Microfiche readers are great microscopes for looking at hair. I had a bank
of them set up in a History-Herstory-Hairstory exhibit at the museum, where
you could compare your own hair with dog, beaver, deer, horse, nose, cat,
gopher, beard, etc. It was a hoot to see people lined up looking while
tearing their hair out.
cp in bc
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Leeke" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 5:48 AM
Subject: [BP] Sound Plaster
> Mike writes:
>
> >>What is the method of analysis for determining that it is cocker
> spaniel hair
> as opposed to mutt hair with only partial cocker spaniel DNA? >>
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|