BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender:
"BP - \"Preservationists shouldn't be neat freaks.\" -- Mary D" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Michael P. Edison" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:10:52 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"BP - \"Preservationists shouldn't be neat freaks.\" -- Mary D" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Message text written by "BP - \"Preservationists shouldn't be neat
freaks.\"  -- Mary D"
>None of that newfangled bubblicious epoxy-based
stuff.  We want old-growth bazooka.
<

I went to my resident teenager for an expert opinion on this critical
materials science issue, and he stated (though not in these terms) that
Bubblicious is generally preferred for its lower modulus, although stale
Bazooka has a funky appeal that is hard to justify scientifically but is
curiously satisfying at times.

Mike E.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2