BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: eroded limestone question
From:
[log in to unmask]
Reply To:
The listserv that doubts your pants are worth $42 million.
Date:
Sat, 28 Jul 2007 16:21:57 EDT
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (821 bytes) , text/html (1596 bytes) 
 
In a message dated 7/28/2007 1:33:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[log in to unmask] writes:

Sounds to me (note caveat, for which our stone experts will flay me) like 
some sort of weak (coral poop?) or otherwise poorly-consolidated strata in the 
stone , which may or may not have been apparent at the time of quarrying and/or 
erection.

Kind of funny that the may-not-have-been-apparent-at-the-time-of-erection 
striations are 90-95% in one direction.
 
Probably just a coincidence.   Like the fourth gunshot from the grassy knoll.
 
yrs Exner 



************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2