BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"BP - \"Infarct a Laptop Daily\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ken Follett <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 11:01:44 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"BP - \"Infarct a Laptop Daily\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
In a message dated 3/7/00 10:23:06 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> Why don't I see more tc failure from such installations?

TC fractures require telescope to spot?

My interest is how TC cracks following relief of stress. When you take out
one unit of TC you have to be cautious surrounding units do not crack. Too
many extra cracked units gets expensive. I don't think this happens as often
with stone or brick.

][<en

ATOM RSS1 RSS2