Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Yes, we set off an A-bomb but we are really sorry about it. |
Date: | Sat, 2 Dec 2006 20:32:03 EST |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 12/2/2006 7:21:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
So, is glazed brick as it is presently made any "better" than the infamous
glazed brick of the 1960s?
New glazed brick may be better, but as a man who looks wise in retrospect
once said, trust but verify.
One has to check the manufacturer's test reports to find out whether the
brick (any brick, but glazed in particular) has a coefficient of saturation not
greater than .75, and an initial rate of absorption between 10-20 gm/min/30
sq. in.
Brick with test results which aren't within those ranges are unlikely to be
durable in the NY climate, primarily because the brick soak up too much
water, and in the winter the water freezes and there goes the glazed face. That's
typically what happened with 60's glazed brick, as I remember.
Ralph
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|