Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:00:31 EST |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 1/15/2010 7:18:38 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
It doesn't really melt, but the fire damage causes it to loose profiles
and surface and basically the granite most affected just "melts" away.
I'm a chemist, but I can say nothing about the mechanism involved.
Steve Stokowski - any comment?
Any material containing the mineral quartz, which changes volume at 573
degrees C, deteriorates in a fire. This is the alpha to beta
crystallographic transition temperature.
Granites have about 25% Q, but essentially no porosity, so they crumble
from the fire side to the interior. Quartzites (quartz-cemented quartz
sandstones) also perform poorly. Brownstones don't do well either, but the
porosity tends to relieve the crystallographic strain better than it is
relieved in the much less porous granite, and brownstone also can be a bit moist
which in some conditions lowers the interior temperatures a bit, resulting in
slightly less fire damage, but in other conditions, especially hot fast
fires, results in the brownstone exploding from the built up internal steam
pressure..
The alpha-beta transition temperature is why the boulders scale and crack
around those campfire pits. It is also the reason why you cannot
successfully replace the stone in your gas grill with normal river gravel. And why
refractory mortar contains cristobalite instead of quartz, although both
minerals are SiO2.
Steve Stokowski
--
**Please remember to trim posts, as requested in the Terms of Service**
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|