Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:37:59 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Amen.
--Lou K2LKK
At 12:33 PM 2/26/2008 -0500, you wrote:
>Hmm, MFJ dropping quality, that's pretty typical.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:27 PM
>Subject: Re: antenna info
>
>
> > Hi Ed;
> > Just looked at the dx77 reviews on e-ham. Did you use guide ropes for
> > yours? Any idea when mfj took over good old high gain? The complaint
> > seemed to be that quality went down to nothing when mfj took over.
> >
> > I very much appreciate the suggestion.
> > Richard
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ed Malmgren" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 4:23 PM
> > Subject: Fw: antenna info
> >
> >
> > Richard, I once had a Hygain D X 77 which was the best vertical i ever
> > owned. I got a tower up so sold it. I don't know if they still make that
> > antenna but maybe if you could find one you would like it. It covered 40
> > through 10 including the wark bands. Stay away from the D X 88 which
> > also
> > covered 80 but not a performer. Just a thought.
> > Ed K7UC
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 1:34 PM
> > Subject: antenna info
> >
> >
> >> Hi Everyone;
> >> I have spent the winter antenna browsing and I know less now than I did
> >> before. At any rate, I was initially looking for an hf vertical
> >> covering
> >> at least 40 through 10 (75 would be nice) that was a vertical dipole and
> >> didn't therefore require radials.
> >> I have eliminated the r8 (been through two al ready. I also decided that
> >> because I had an amplifier that I was going to try and use I was going to
> >> stay away from the gap. Took a look at force 12 and decided I wasn't
> >> going
> >> that route either. Anyone know of any exciting options that are durable
> >> and
> >> really work?
> >> The second option was to go with something ground mounted and bite the
> >> bullet and put down radials. I wanted self supporting though. My
> >> initial
> >> thought was the steppir but its rather tall and I suspect not really all
> >> that self supporting. The price was as much as a ts480 which was also a
> >> consideration.
> >> The other option is a "simple" g5rv but I need a 30 foot support for the
> >> center. Unfortunately there isn't a convenient tree.
> >> We have had lots of wind the last few years and I don't really really
> >> want
> >> to worry about the thing coming down in the neighbors lawn. I think we
> >> had
> >> about three wind storms that might have killed my r8.
> >> Its much cheaper to ask for suggestions prior to spending money.
> >> Richard
> >> [log in to unmask]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1300 - Release Date: 2/26/2008
>7:50 PM
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
|
|
|