BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Jan 2008 13:36:31 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (98 lines)
I know it has to do with frequency, but a few people say this one should be 
right in range. 449.275 I think it is in west Bridgewater MA. That would be 
a shame to lose it though the use is limited by the DCS tone.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: 440


> John,
>
> I think the issue is distance from the radar site, and possibly frequency.
> What machine are you referring to?
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 12:11
> Subject: Re: 440
>
>
>> RI as well has been affected and rumor is they're looking at 1 or 2
>> machines
>> in CT but I have nothing official on that. I'm still surprised the 440
>> machine with the best coverage in MA hasn't been touched yet when the
>> numbers indicate it should be, I"m wondering if they're just going after
>> everyone based on an older list at first and this one has only been up 
>> for
>> maybe a year now.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 12:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: 440
>>
>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I think this is just a regional issue in California and Massachusetts. 
>>> I
>>> haven't heard anything about closing down the band elsewhere.
>>>
>>> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At 11:13 AM 12/30/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>>>>I hope not.
>>>>
>>>>I really enjoy 440 especially with an ht.
>>>>
>>>>73 De Anthony W2AJV
>>>>[log in to unmask]
>>>>ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: "Walter Hampton" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:27 PM
>>>>Subject: 440
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Are we going to lose the 440 cm band? i paid a lot of money for my =
>>>> > radio. k7ij Bruce had to shut off his repeater. what a waste. it sure
>>>> > =
>>>> > makes me mad. all that money. and all the repeaters have to be shut =
>>>> > down. what is next? 2 meters? Whatv is going to happen next to 
>>>> > 440?=20
>>>> >
>>>> > from walter wb6jtj Walter p.s. 440 was, or is a good band.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1206 - Release Date:
>>>>1/1/2008
>>>>12:09 PM
>>>
>>> Louis Kim Kline
>>> A.R.S. K2LKK
>>> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>>> Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>>> Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2