Martha:
> I think a FAQ would be nice, tho I acknowledge that it would
> be a heck of a lot of work to put one together.  And no, I'm
> not volunteering!!!!!!

David:
Why not volunteer, but in small/specialist roles ? This would
be a great project to spread amongst contributors. Instead of
having to answer "what is cassia" again for example, we could
have an FAQ that had hints to get to archived posts that did
a perfectly good job of explaining such issues before.

>
> Also, it may not be possible to answer any questions in a
> FAQ without actually taking a position, as if there was a
> concensus on, well, *anything* !
>

David:
Well, I think we can come up with an arrangement to both
inform new-comers of information without having to bother
others to continue repeating similar information over time.
If we get an FAQ, I see it as being more informative than
an editorial.I believe that the contributions should
attempt to be balanced, informative enough to let the reader
have an idea of what is there, and make no absolute
proclamations as imperitive dogma.

Will folks let me know of interest in starting
a raw-food FAQ, as Martha suggests ?


Thanks Martha, a great suggestion !

Regards,

David
[log in to unmask]