BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated
From:
Fred Adams <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 May 2015 11:42:57 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines) 
Sorry but I deleted it already and my deleted folder has been cleaned out
to.

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Tom Behler
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 11:33 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated

Fred:

I'm not finding the NPRM in your e-mail.

I'm obviously missing something.

Would like to forward it onto others if you have it.

Tom Behler: KB8TYJ


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Fred Adams
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 7:26 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: FW: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated

Subject: RE: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated (TCW)

This is very interesting and not totally clear. There are two distinct fees
regarding Vanity Call Signs; the initial application fee and the renewal
fee. This NPRM clearly states that the application fees are to be
eliminated but it is not clear if the renewal fees are also to be
eliminated. There is no redundancy in fee collections for renewals as there
is for multiple applications for the same call sign. Time will tell.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2