BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated
From:
Tom Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 May 2015 11:32:58 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines) 
Fred:

I'm not finding the NPRM in your e-mail.

I'm obviously missing something.

Would like to forward it onto others if you have it.

Tom Behler: KB8TYJ


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Fred Adams
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 7:26 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: FW: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated

Subject: RE: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated (TCW)

This is very interesting and not totally clear. There are two distinct fees
regarding Vanity Call Signs; the initial application fee and the renewal
fee. This NPRM clearly states that the application fees are to be eliminated
but it is not clear if the renewal fees are also to be eliminated. There is
no redundancy in fee collections for renewals as there is for multiple
applications for the same call sign. Time will tell.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2