BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lou Kolb <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Jan 2014 12:28:56 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)
Tom,

Turning down the RF gain is a good idea and turning off the AGC, if 
possible, is an even better one.  Of course, the AGC activity would make it 
difficult if not impossible to hear the null.  I turn mine off when trying 
to orient the beam on a signal but I know not every rig has this function 
available.  Good luck.
Lou Kolb
Voice-over Artist:
Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
Messages On-hold:
www.loukolb.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2014 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: MFJ Noise Bridge Again


> Howard:
>
> I think I'll have to back the RF gain down on the TS480 at least somewhat 
> in
> order to effectively work with the noise bridge, based on my limited
> experience with the device and my TS590.  Adjusting the RF gain on the 480
> is, of course, a bit of a hassle, since you have to do it via the front
> panel keypad and function knob, rather than a simple single knob 
> adjustment,
> but it is doable.  I seem to recall it is number 6, but will have to check
> the manual.
>
> In any case, I'm not going to go out into the RV today and try it, since
> temps are in the single digits, wind chills are below 0, and since I'd 
> have
> to trudge through at least 12 inches of snow to get there.  (grin)
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Howard Kaufman
> Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2014 11:11 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: MFJ Noise Bridge Again
>
> Tom, you got it right!
> The minimum pulse is very accurate.  Any additional circuitry adds loss.
> I am not sure if you can just attenuate the signal while listening on the
> 480, or if you will have to crank the rf gain back as well.
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2