BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Jan 2014 11:22:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Howard:

I think I'll have to back the RF gain down on the TS480 at least somewhat in
order to effectively work with the noise bridge, based on my limited
experience with the device and my TS590.  Adjusting the RF gain on the 480
is, of course, a bit of a hassle, since you have to do it via the front
panel keypad and function knob, rather than a simple single knob adjustment,
but it is doable.  I seem to recall it is number 6, but will have to check
the manual.

In any case, I'm not going to go out into the RV today and try it, since
temps are in the single digits, wind chills are below 0, and since I'd have
to trudge through at least 12 inches of snow to get there.  (grin)

Tom Behler: KB8TYJ


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Howard Kaufman
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2014 11:11 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: MFJ Noise Bridge Again

Tom, you got it right!
The minimum pulse is very accurate.  Any additional circuitry adds loss.
I am not sure if you can just attenuate the signal while listening on the
480, or if you will have to crank the rf gain back as well.


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2