BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 May 2013 20:38:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
Buddy,

Every relationship has its plusses and minuses, and I suspect that 
individually they don't matter as much as your ability to work with each 
other and respect each other.  I'm always sad when I hear about someone 
giving up on another person because of a newly acquired disability.  I think 
the only reason I'd give up on someone is if I thought they weren't trying 
to meet me half way in the relationship, and it doesn't even have to be 
exactly half way just as long as there's some effort.  But like so many 
things in life, you never fully know what you'll do until you're confronted 
with a situation; that's the real test, and sometimes it's awfully hard to 
pass.

Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Buddy Brannan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 17:11
Subject: Re: sighted wife


> Steve, man, you said it all right there. I happen to be very lucky and =
> very blessed with a marriage that works. In a bit of irony, my wife =
> Melanie is now legally blind, and she has some other disabilities that =
> severely limit her mobility. That means that, along with being the tech =
> support jack of many trades at Serotek, I also cook and help melanie =
> into bed and a whole host of other things. There'd be more things if she =
> didn't have a personal care attendant in several days a week. In a bit =
> of irony, as I was saying, Melanie's last nearly husband (she sensibly =
> called it off) told her he wouldn't mind so much if she were in a =
> wheelchairr someday, which was, even then, a distinct possibility she =
> knew about. She also knew that blindness was a possibility. He told her =
> that if she was going to go blind, they may as well not get married, =
> because he couldn't lead her around all the time. So she meets me at a =
> time when she wasn't yet legally blind. Her vision did deteriorate by =
> considerable, especially over the past couple years. But we both are =
> amused that this guysaid that, but then she marries me, and who leads =
> whom around now? Tangentially, she is really a pretty awful blind =
> person=85the adjustment has been very hard for her, but I think the =
> physical limitations are even worse. I sure wouldn't swap with her given =
> the choice. But the thing is, sure, we both think it would be easier if =
> we didn't have whatever it is we do have, but we've got what we've got, =
> we complement each other's strengths, and we love each other very much. =
> These are the important things. Theother things are secondary.
> --
> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
> Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2