Hi,

I also have an RF applications P2000 watt meter and it can't be beat!  I'm 
interested in a new model too.

I also use the Vec512 noise bridge and like it, but I was just told that MFJ 
was no longer going to make that noise bridge.  The MFJ212 is not the same 
unit.

Bob, K8LR, [log in to unmask]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Malmgren" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: Audible s w r/p w r meter


Fred, I feel the same way with C W being the readout, It is much easier for
me to understand with all the external noises kicking around the shack.  73
Ed   K7UC

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Fred Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 6:05 PM
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Audible s w r/p w r meter

> To me, the P200 is more simple and stable.  Also, very dependable.  A
> technician checked out the P2000 for me with a Byrd watt meter and told me
> that he didn't think I could find a better one for me.  I have tried the
> TW1 several time but I just do not like it.  If I had never used the P2000
> and used the TW1 from the start I am sure I would like it much better.  If
> a new one comes out and I can afford it, I'll give it a try.  One reason I
> like the p2000 might be because I like hearing everything read out in CW.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Dave Marthouse
> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 7:38 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Audible s w r/p w r meter
>
> Hi Fred,
>
> Just out of curiosity why don't you like the TW1?
>
>
>
> Dave Marthouse N2AAM
> [log in to unmask]
>
>