BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:44:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (164 lines)
Lou,

Thanks for the kind words on my audio.  It's nice to know that someone out 
there hears an improvement.  You've made me feel better about the 480.

Tom, we might be able to hear each other on 40 meters if we pick the right 
time of day.  Let me know if there's a good time for you, and I'll try to be 
there.

Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 17:06
Subject: Re: ts480


> No, Tom, it's not bad at all.  It's quite good communications audio and
> probably at least as good as the 706.  It just doesn't have that gorgeous,
> clean sound Kenwood has become famous for.  However, I have heard Steve
> Dresser's and with the W2IHY  box he has ahead of it, it sounds quite 
> good.
> In fact, it's the best sounding 480 I've heard.  Lou
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 4:42 PM
> Subject: Re: ts480
>
>
>>     Guys:
>>
>> Is the transmit audio on the TS480 really bad?
>>
>> Am I going to be disappointed in it if I take the plunge and get this
> radio?
>>
>> How does it compare to the transmit audio of say the IC706 or IC718?
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 4:36 PM
>> Subject: Re: ts480
>>
>>
>> > Hi Anthony,
>> >
>> > It's the only problem I have with the radio.  At times like this, I 
>> > wish
> I
>> > was skilled enough with a soldering iron to modify the filter myself.
> It
>> > shouldn't be a big deal for anyone who knows what they're doing, so I
>> > wonder
>> > why nobody has tried it yet.
>> >
>> > Steve
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message ----- 
>> > From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
>> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 17:48
>> > Subject: Re: ts480
>> >
>> >
>> >> Hi Steve;
>> >>
>> >> Your absolutely right.
>> >>
>> >> I mean the transmit audio is just not what I'm accustomed to hearing.
>> >>
>> >> Anthony
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> >> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:57 AM
>> >> Subject: Re: ts480
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> Anthony,
>> >>>
>> >>> The problem with the TX audio is that the widest filter you have on
> SSB
>> >>> is
>> >>> 2.4KHz.  To me, that's the most important difference between the 
>> >>> TS480
>> >>> and
>> >>> the TS2000.  I wish somebody would come up with a mod for changing
> that
>> >>> filter width.
>> >>>
>> >>> Steve
>> >>>
>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> >>> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
>> >>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> >>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 17:49
>> >>> Subject: Re: ts480
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hi Richard;
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You can really get away without the filters.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> First of all, the filters have to be soldered in.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Could you believe it in this day an age?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> When I had mine I didn't find I needed the filters.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> My main complaint with  the radio is that the audio output from the
>> >>>> transmitter does not have that Kenwood footprint.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Even with the software, I wasn't able to open the audio out to 3.0
>> >>>>
>> >>>> As I said in an earlier post, I'm going to wait and see what Kenwood
>> >>>> comes
>> >>>> out with next.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 73 De Anthony W2AJV
>> >>>> [log in to unmask]
>> >>>> ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> >>>> From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
>> >>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> >>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:57 AM
>> >>>> Subject: ts480
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hi Tom and list;
>> >>>>> I believe wires four and five are reversed for the ts480.  I have
>> >>>>> heard
>> >>>>> rf
>> >>>>> complaints concerning the mc60 and wonder what else works well.
>> >>>>> As for the 480, I have generally purchased new radios and had the
>> >>>>> seller
>> >>>>> install voice board and filters.  Lazy I admit it.  I have seen a
> few
>> >>>>> ts480s
>> >>>>> used and wonder how much of a pain filter and speech installation
> is?
>> >>>>> Most
>> >>>>> used ones are just the radios no filters and no speech.
>> >>>>> Richard
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2