Hi,

The big problem with System Access 2.0 is that a user is required to 
subscribe to the FreedomBox network.  Though the program will work on its 
own, it apparently requires access to FreedomBox network features to work 
with internet explorer.
Bob, [log in to unmask] K8LR
Skype-name, bobtinn
If you choose to look at the bright side,
You will definitely be happier!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] System Access 2.0


Hi.

I have seen the software, and my impression of it is that if it talks out
of the box with the programs that you want to use, great!  If it doesn't,
there isn't much you can do about it--it isn't as configurable as the
screen readers like JAWS, Window-Eyes, or HAL.

If you are looking to do a lot of Internet, e-mail, and a little word
processing thrown for good measure, this can be a good deal for you.  It's
big selling point is portability.  You can take it to any machine and be up
and running in seconds.

Its real downside is that it doesn't do well with programs like Excel or
Access, so if your computing leans more towards the professional programs,
you had better skip this one.  It's really intended for the home user who
is using it for leisure activities.

73, de Lou K2LKK