Thanks! Yes please let me know what you find out!
Just because you can not see the stars does not mean you can not reach for
them.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: Trunking Scanner


>I think that they are digital, and in that case you would need the Pro-96.
> I have a Uniden BC250D and a Pro-96, and the 96 is more user friendly I
> think.  I'm not sure about the Uniden BC296, or 796, but I can check on
> those and get back to the list once I hear anything from the groups I am
> subscribed to for those groups, but I would go with the Pro-96
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, r.mcmanomy wrote:
>
>> Hello I live in Lafayette Indiana.
>> I am trying to find the cheapest Trunking Scanner with out givine up
>> quality
>> and ease of use for a blind person.
>> I am pretty sure that Lafayette is Trunking because I can not get
>> anything
>> on my analog scanner.
>> Just because you can not see the stars does not mean you can not reach
>> for
>> them.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 1:15 PM
>> Subject: Re: Trunking Scanner
>>
>>
>> > Depending on where you may be it may or may not work though as you
>> > might
>> > need something that will handle APCO-25 as stated earlier.
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Glen Schroeder" <[log in to unmask]>
>> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 3:59 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Trunking Scanner
>> >
>> >
>> >> The Radio Shack PRO 95 handheld scanner is a great scanner.  I've had
>> >> one
>> >> for about a month.  The PRO 94 is a good one too, except with the 94
>> >> you
>> >> can't scan analog and trunked channels at the same time as you can
>> >> with
>> >> the
>> >> 95.
>> >>
>> >> Glen Schroeder
>> >> Madison WI
>> >> KA9YIU
>> >
>>
>