I think that they are digital, and in that case you would need the Pro-96.
I have a Uniden BC250D and a Pro-96, and the 96 is more user friendly I
think.  I'm not sure about the Uniden BC296, or 796, but I can check on
those and get back to the list once I hear anything from the groups I am
subscribed to for those groups, but I would go with the Pro-96





On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, r.mcmanomy wrote:

> Hello I live in Lafayette Indiana.
> I am trying to find the cheapest Trunking Scanner with out givine up quality
> and ease of use for a blind person.
> I am pretty sure that Lafayette is Trunking because I can not get anything
> on my analog scanner.
> Just because you can not see the stars does not mean you can not reach for
> them.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 1:15 PM
> Subject: Re: Trunking Scanner
>
>
> > Depending on where you may be it may or may not work though as you might
> > need something that will handle APCO-25 as stated earlier.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Glen Schroeder" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 3:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: Trunking Scanner
> >
> >
> >> The Radio Shack PRO 95 handheld scanner is a great scanner.  I've had one
> >> for about a month.  The PRO 94 is a good one too, except with the 94 you
> >> can't scan analog and trunked channels at the same time as you can with
> >> the
> >> 95.
> >>
> >> Glen Schroeder
> >> Madison WI
> >> KA9YIU
> >
>