BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Handiham <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:50:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
I looked at eQSO and found it to be less intuitive than EchoLink, and also
less configurable. It did not appear to serve any function not already
covered by EchoLink for what might be considered normal QSO's, but it may
have an advantage for larger round-table discussions.


Regards,

Patrick Tice
[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bob -- KA5ETA
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 10:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: e-qso

eqso is something like Echolink the big difference is the no one checks to
see if you have an call sign.  after downloading and installing eqso you put
a name or call sign in the currect place  you are good to go.  it is more
like an chat room than echolink.  There are a lot of non hams using eqso.
hope this help a little.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard and Karlene" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 9:17 PM
Subject: e-qso


> Has any worked with something called eqso?  Apparently its somewhat
similar
> to echolink.  The folks at handihams were wondering if it worked with jfw.
> As for me, I'm still playing with echo link.
> Rich

ATOM RSS1 RSS2