also eqso doesn't screen out nonhams as I recall. so you don't need a ham
license.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Handiham" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: e-qso


> I looked at eQSO and found it to be less intuitive than EchoLink, and also
> less configurable. It did not appear to serve any function not already
> covered by EchoLink for what might be considered normal QSO's, but it may
> have an advantage for larger round-table discussions.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick Tice
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bob -- KA5ETA
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 10:58 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: e-qso
>
> eqso is something like Echolink the big difference is the no one checks to
> see if you have an call sign.  after downloading and installing eqso you
put
> a name or call sign in the currect place  you are good to go.  it is more
> like an chat room than echolink.  There are a lot of non hams using eqso.
> hope this help a little.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard and Karlene" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 9:17 PM
> Subject: e-qso
>
>
> > Has any worked with something called eqso?  Apparently its somewhat
> similar
> > to echolink.  The folks at handihams were wondering if it worked with
jfw.
> > As for me, I'm still playing with echo link.
> > Rich