BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kevin Nathan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 01:49:35 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Hi Chris,

I'm not sure who you were addressing this too.  As for me, I do run ASAP for
the dos stuff in dos boxes off of windows and all works very well for me.
JFW itself doesn't read the programs I run in dos very well within dos boxes
and while I suppose I could probably write scripts to accomplish these
tasks, I really don't have the expertise or patience to do that.  My main
concern here was noise generated by the Doubletalk internal synth but I'm
not seeing many good alternatives to it.  On the other hand I took the
doubletalk out of my computer last night and notice little difference in
overall noise level or amount of spurs.  I have a feeling the noise here is
coming from other sources outside my immediate control.  I think the only
real alternative might be the MFJ noise canceling device.

Take care and very 73.

Kevin, K7RX :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Christopher Moore
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 01:08
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Internal Synthesizers and Radio Noise


Why not use jaws in a dos box?  Or, if you really want to run dos, bot up
plain dos w/o windows.

73, chris w1gm
--
The Moon is Waning Crescent (1% of Full)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2