BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Old Receivers
From:
Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 10:29:14 -0700
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (32 lines) 
MMM ... I thought that was the transmitter.  I knew the name of the
receiver five years ago but it isn't coming to me now.

Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
Amateur Radio: < K 7 U I J >

On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Walt Smith wrote:

> Mike -
>
> Was it the Mohawk?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Freeman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Old Receivers
>
>
> Walt:
>
> That's gonna bother me all day and I'll probably think of the name at 2
> o'clock tomorrow morning.
>
> But Heath came out with the Mohican a few years later -- transistorized
> receiver that ran on 12V external power or 8 D cells.  Not a bad radio for
> its day either (I wouldn't mind one of those, either).
>
> Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
> Amateur Radio: < K 7 U I J >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2