PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Rode <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Mar 2002 12:37:20 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
While a USB port may be faster,  it is a meaningless fact, in light of the
tiny bit of bandwidth a cable modem requires. Any old ISA 10bps NIC would
work just as well.
Until I started using a router as my NAT, ... I used an old 486 with a just
such NICs as my NAT. I was able download and upload at speeds in excess of
3 megabytes per minute. Personally I would use a NIC and save my USB port
for something else.

Rode
The NOSPIN Group


you wrote:
>I just installed a cable modem, which is great so far. The cable tech who
>came used the USB port, stating that it's faster than using a PCMCIA card
>in my notebook. Was he right? Any differences other than speed?
>When I get a new desktop, he said to use the USB port vs the built-in NIC
>port. Right again?
>Rob
>
>

        The NOSPIN Group provides a monthly newsletter with great
       tips, information and ideas: NOSPIN-L, The NOSPIN Magazine
           Visit our web site to signup: http://freepctech.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2