On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jim Swayze wrote:
> Again, once the fish has met that caloric threshold, other considerations
than caloric density come into play.
Todd> Okay, that makes sense. Now how does that translate into support for
the claim that sweet potatoes or other tubers would have been a marginal
(i.e., non-preferred) food?
I do not know, Todd. I can see arguments for each side, but for lack of
better evidence, I personally choose to exclude them right now. Maybe I'll
try to work some in once I'm through trying to justify the "paleo-ness" of
Australian Shiraz ;-)