On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jim Swayze wrote: > Again, once the fish has met that caloric threshold, other considerations than caloric density come into play. Todd> Okay, that makes sense. Now how does that translate into support for the claim that sweet potatoes or other tubers would have been a marginal (i.e., non-preferred) food? I do not know, Todd. I can see arguments for each side, but for lack of better evidence, I personally choose to exclude them right now. Maybe I'll try to work some in once I'm through trying to justify the "paleo-ness" of Australian Shiraz ;-)