BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:59:27 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (79 lines)
Well, I have Win-98, and I never had any problems until I got it home, and
began to devote time to upgradisoftware.  What kind of sound card do you
have?





On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Mike Freeman wrote:

> I think it was about the same age as yours; I bought it second-hand.  I
> have the latest service pack of I E 5 and it's running fine.  Stil running
> Win95; there's the occasional glitch but that's W95. (grin)  But I haven't
> experienced the problems you had.  Not saying they aren't real.
>
> Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
> Amateur Radio: < K 7 U I J >
>
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON wrote:
>
> > Well, how old is your computer?  Like I said mine is about two in anhalf,
> > and that is getting up there in computer years.  I don't think that JFW
> > was my only problem, but the simple upgrading of software was too much for
> > it to handle.  It started with the upgrade to IE 5.5 and then IE 6 when
> > Iwwould get the kernell32.dll error, and then JAWS 3.7 and up would lock
> > up on me.  I heard that 4.0 has a lot of problems, and 4.01 was
> > supposedoto have corrected the .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Mike Freeman wrote:
> >
> > > Actually, I had very little trouble with JAWS 4.0.  4.01 had a problem
> > > wherein I lost focus in Outlook Express. 4.02 Beta, however, solved that
> > > problem and is working great!
> > >
> > > Different strokes ...
> > >
> > > Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Amateur Radio: < K 7 U I J >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, I guess then you just do the best you can.  I have an older computer
> > > > that was purchased in 1999.  It still has the Pentium II processor,k and
> > > > it wasn't just JFW that was giving me problems.  When I downloaded later
> > > > versions of IE I started getting all kinds of error messages almost
> > > > immediately.  I'm impressed with what is in 4.0 and 4.01, but I think that
> > > > they jumped the gun when they released these versions with so many bugs in
> > > > them.  I got this computer from Human Ware and they also can sell JFW as
> > > > you probabluy all know, but like I said I will either have to get a new
> > > > machine or upgrade processors, and I don't know what I will do now.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Walt Smith wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > There were known problems with the frames utility in both JFW 4.0 and 4.01,
> > > > > but these have been corrected in the public beta of 4.02.  The Frames
> > > > > Manager utility was completely redesigned and I'll admit that it takes some
> > > > > getting used to; but once you have, it's as easy to create a new frame as it
> > > > > always was.  The problem with deliberately backleveling yourself with JFW is
> > > > > that you really can't go much farther back than 3.71 because too many newer
> > > > > apps simply aren't supported ... IE/OE 6 and Adobe Acrobat 5.05, for
> > > > > example.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >  Walt Smith - Raleigh, NC
> > > > >  [log in to unmask]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2