BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Walt Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:33:20 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Jeffrey -

The point isn't that some device ... a laptop, for example ... is a
radiator, per se.  The point is that specific devices are _designed_ to
radiate in very specific frequency ranges and those have the potential for
head-on collisions with avionics.  Don't argue with the rule, just observe
it ... you're an FCC licensee and should be used to this concept.  I haven't
seen any hams trying to challenge this FAA regulation before the FCC, which
I interpret as fairly sound proof that it's a good rule.

--
 Walt Smith - Raleigh, NC
 [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2